Quick Review: Surprisingly, "2:22" impresses from the get-go with its sharp editing, brilliant camera work, and cool score. The introduction of the central character captivates with style and originality, but as soon as the mystery takes center stage, the whole thing becomes a bit muddled, and even confusing due to a messy writing. After a few twists, everything starts to make sense, but the climax is far from rewarding. While Palmer doesn't disappoint at all, Huisman's acting is so inconsistent.
Sunday, July 9, 2017
[5.75/10] 2:22 (2017)
2:22 (2017)
Quick Review: Surprisingly, "2:22" impresses from the get-go with its sharp editing, brilliant camera work, and cool score. The introduction of the central character captivates with style and originality, but as soon as the mystery takes center stage, the whole thing becomes a bit muddled, and even confusing due to a messy writing. After a few twists, everything starts to make sense, but the climax is far from rewarding. While Palmer doesn't disappoint at all, Huisman's acting is so inconsistent.
Quick Review: Surprisingly, "2:22" impresses from the get-go with its sharp editing, brilliant camera work, and cool score. The introduction of the central character captivates with style and originality, but as soon as the mystery takes center stage, the whole thing becomes a bit muddled, and even confusing due to a messy writing. After a few twists, everything starts to make sense, but the climax is far from rewarding. While Palmer doesn't disappoint at all, Huisman's acting is so inconsistent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment